Preparing for Nibbana

pohtiongho By pohtiongho, 23rd Jun 2013 | Follow this author | RSS Feed
Posted in Wikinut>Writing>Religion>Buddhism

You can attain a level of the deathless, if you care to find out. It is not a belief. You can feel your progress on the way.

Preparing for Nibbana

Preparing for Nibbana
To sacrifice a precious life struggling for a few pieces of paper money, is it worthwhile? No doubt, we need to use a portion of our time to earn a living. But why not we also spend some time preparing for the real happiness of attaining Nibbana? Even if we do not attain it during this life time, we may succeed in our future rebirths, or at least for the future rebirths to take place in a more congenial place.

The spiritual happiness is hard to reach because we the mortals have been immersed in the deep ocean of passions for countless existences since the inconceivable past.
Anyone wishing to experience the bliss of Nibbana has to fulfill three conditions:
1) Find a teacher who can give the proper instruction in the technique of meditation and to associate only with men of integrity and wisdom.
2) Need to gain an intellectual understanding of the teaching,
3) Need to practice what one has been taught.
A meditator intending to gain freedom from all kinds of suffering must first find a teacher who can give the proper instruction on the technique of meditation. He needs to be guided step by step. So it is best done face to face. An intellectual understanding of the teaching is also needed. The meditator has to practice what he or she has been taught. By studying and listening to discourses one gains the proper framework to understand what one experiences in meditation. The purpose is to release the mind from hindrance after hindrance, and to render it more and more suitable and worthy to acquire the superhuman qualities which are required to attain Arahanthood.

One of Buddha’s disciples was an elderly monk called Pottila, who was bright and was reputed of being an expert at expanding in details whatever teachings the Buddha had given in brief. Despite his popularity and reputation, the Buddha called him “empty Pottila”, and the truth dawned on him that he had no wisdom because he did not practice the Dhamma.
Pottila looked for a quiet place to meditate and realized he had to find a well-qualified teacher. He went to a forest where there were thirty monks, all of them were Arahants. He approached the senior monk and asked him for instruction. This monk politely declined fearing that his simple technique would not be accepted by Pottila. Pottila went to look for the other twenty-nine monks and asked for the same thing. All of them refused, except the young monk who was still doubtful of Pottila’s sincerity. He asked Pottila to cross a small stream. Pottila did so. This young monk was then convinced that Pottila would follow his advice. He went on: “Here is an anthill with six holes and under it lives a lizard. Someone would have to close five of the holes and leave just one of them open and then he would be able to capture the lizard easily.”
Pottila respectfully saluted the young monk and said: “What a great teacher you are; I fully understood, you need teach me nothing further.”
The young monk asked what it was that he had understood. Pottila said: “Great teacher, I understand that there are six sense doors; I have to close five of them, and open only the mind door. This is how you want me to practice.”
Pottila found a solitary place, meditated for three days and attained Arahanthood.
The Buddha was not an eternalist, nor was He an annihilationist, (a person who denies the survival of the personality in any form after death). According to Him, there were only events which arise because of previous conditions. But when asked if the person who was reborn was the same as the previous one who died, the Buddha said it was neither the same nor another person. The self, which other religions named as soul, jiva, atma or purusa is not constant, everlasting or eternal. It is subject to change, and will not endure as long as eternity.

The Buddha did not say Anatta meant voidness of the self or nothingness. According to Him the self consisted of the physical and mental factors constituting the so called five aggregates. They are there but there is nothing which is permanent, whether you call it self or soul. He did not doubt the fact of an individualized existence, with a relative identification within the continuous change of bodily and mental process. Our understanding of existence is in a limited and one-sided way. The five aggregates are: body, feeling, ideation, volitional activities and consciousness, which are also the same as: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body consciousness.
According to Buddhism, it is wrong to say: I have no self, (which is the annihilationist theory). It is also wrong to say that I have a self, (the eternalist theory). In the Alayaddupama Sutta, the Buddha says: “O bhikku, when neither self nor anything pertaining to self can truly and really be found, the speculative view : The universe is that Atman (Soul); I shall be that after death, permanent, abiding, ever-lasting, unchanging, and I shall exist as such for eternity,” is it not wholly and completely foolish?”
The self is most difficult for us to part with. Upon death, when we leave the physical body, we still cling to the self. This self leads us to rebirth in various spheres. The thing that we call self is a convention of the world, like you say the sun rises from the east.


Annililationist, Arahanthood, Consciousness, Jiva, Meditator, Potilla, Rebirth, Soul

Meet the author

author avatar pohtiongho
I have been writing short stories, poems and articles during the past 20 years.
My other talents:
Pipeline fabrications and training of 6 G welders
Oil and gas, Maintenance Services

Share this page

moderator johnnydod moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar cnwriter..carolina
23rd Jun 2013 (#)

very fascinating this thank you....

Reply to this comment

author avatar Kingwell
5th Jul 2013 (#)

I enjoy reading about different religious faiths and find Buddhism to be interesting. I don't think however that anyone has the perfect way.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Zola
28th Aug 2013 (#)

Thank you for sharing this. I find Buddhims fascinating. I read the "Tibetan Book of the Dead" and was amazed to learn abot a completely different approach to death than is the case in Christianity.

Reply to this comment

author avatar pohtiongho
30th Jul 2014 (#)

If you wish to view some Buddhist Website photos, please hit :

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?